Ever found yourself reading about some interesting research, but finding it tough going?

We are currently looking at better ways to communicate research findings to practitioners. ACE researcher Lauren Isaak is conducting a study designed to discover how research-based communications could be made more accessible to practitioners. Focusing on the communication of entrepreneurship research, the study will seek insights from entrepreneurs on length, ‘jargon’, multimedia and source credibility, and investigate how these elements of presentation spur and deter interest in content.

Findings from the research will be used to improve ACE’s communication strategy. The Centre will be looking for volunteers to participate in the study over the next few months.

Can identifying and removing barriers make it possible to accelerate innovation

[BRW Repost]

Every company is looking for the magic formula that will produce breakthrough products and services. But a better starting point is to think about what gets in the way of innovation, especially in firms that already have lots of talented, creative, and motivated people. In other words, by identifying and removing barriers, it might be possible to accelerate innovation simply by leveraging the capability that’s already there.

In that spirit, here are ten common inhibitors that can dampen an organisation’s ability to innovate effectively. Read on …

QIS presents – Story of a Start-Up

Ever thought about turning an idea into a business, come and hear the story of someone who’s been there before. This open event hosted by The QUT Innovation Space (QIS) will be presented by Jo Ucukalo from Handle My Complaint.   Resolving complaints might seem like a hard way to make a dollar, but Handle My Complaint is building a business out of disgruntled customers.  Come listen to how this innovative new business was created: the idea, the start-up and the lessons learnt along the way.

The event is to be held on August 2 from 3 – 6 pm at QUT, Gardens Point Campus, OJW Room, Level 12, S Block.

QIS run events, workshops and mentoring for people passionate about innovation and entrepreneurship.  Contact or read more about QIS

Can microcredit effectively solve the issues micro-entrepreneurs living in poor conditions face

The theme of the fourth edition of the 14th volume of the FSR Forum is Microfinance. In this edition the article by ACE Researchers, Marcello Tonelli and Carol Dalglish is one of three that addresses this delicate issue in terms that are easy to understand by practitioners.  The piece questions whether Microcredit can effectively solve the issues micro-entrepreneurs living in poor conditions face. Important to note is that this article only criticizes specific aspects of Microcredit instead of Microfinance as a whole. The authors conclude with a model implemented in Mozambique, which in their opinion forms a good example for other African countries.  Read more articles in relation to Dr Tonelli and Associate Professor Dalglish’s research.

Can experiential learning lead to the making of an entrepreneurial mindset?

Is entrepreneurship a discipline that can be taught and learnt? The thousands of entrepreneurship courses available around the world would seem to support this line of thinking, but research findings in both developed and developing countries have been inconsistent in estimating the effectiveness of education and training on entrepreneurial attitudes, activity, and aspirations.

It seems in fact that improvements in either tacit or explicit knowledge carry weak consequences for entrepreneurial success, despite the recognition that knowledge in itself increases the cognitive abilities of individuals, leading to more productive potential activity. Under what conditions this potential can be funnelled into successful entrepreneurial activities is a different question.  Read more.

Exploring the “Dark Side” of Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship is often understood to be inherently ‘good’. Terms often associated with entrepreneurship comprise the gamut of favourable connotations from “innovation” and “change” to “growth” and “economic development”. However, if we understand entrepreneurship as being about the discovery and exploitation of opportunities, there really is not necessarily any moral good in entrepreneurship per se

The present research project tried to empirically trace three instances of “dark” entrepreneurship, that is to say, entrepreneurship that is both illegal and covert, for which such data is historically available. Assuming that in order for people to consider “dark entrepreneurship” such efforts should be resilient against attempts to disrupt the venture, our focus is on what makes “dark networks” (one example of dark entrepreneurship) resilient.  Read more.

Experiments in the MBA Classroom: the Case of Time Frames in Project Teams

 “Everybody knows it’s temporary. We all know the deadline, and then we shut down everything here. The whole thing is built up to be broken down. [..] You become one team, certainly, but through it all, in the back of your mind, you ask: for how long will it stay?” – Project engineer on major medical innovation project, interviewed on what characterizes being part of a creative project team.

 New venture projects tend to be founded by entrepreneurs who work in teams. At the stage of venture creation, such teams tend to closely resemble creative projects in which entrepreneurial opportunities need to be grasped in short, focused periods of time. While there is agreement that this “temporal” aspect of project teams is important, there is surprisingly little research on what time frames “do” to project teams.  Read more.

The new venture mortality myth

Studies show that in the world’s advanced economies, new businesses do not suffer a high failure rate. Probably the most comprehensive cross-national set of new business survival rates (or more correctly, one year persistence rates) has been collected by the OECD Entrepreneurship Indicators Programme. For example, in 2005, over 80% of enterprises that entered an OECD country’s official records in one year were still recorded as persisting to the next year.  Five-year persistence rates are just over 50%, on average. Is this a high or a low failure rate? Let’s compare this to job tenure. 

Studies show that the median life of a typical new enterprise in an annual cohort, at around five years, is longer than the median tenure of a new job in Canada or the UK, and around the same as the median spell in self-employment in the US…. Read more.

Schumpeter opens up new opportunities for entrepreneurship scholars

The biannual Schumpeter conference, held in Brisbane from July 2-5, opened up new opportunities for entrepreneurship scholars for collaboration with the broader evolutionary economics community. The conference brought together more than 200 delegates for a couple of days of lively discussion and debate at the University of Queensland. The Australian Centre of Entrepreneurship was a proud sponsor of this conference.

One of the key topics discussed at the conference was the future development of the scholarly field of evolutionary economics. Thereby, evolutionary economics seems to move into the direction of entrepreneurship. To cite one of the fields’ key contributors, evolutionary economics mainly “focuses on the processes that transform the economy from within and on their consequences for firms and industries, production, trade, employment and growth” (Witt, U. 2008). Thereby the field has emphasized and popularized the importance of innovation in the scientific community as well as among policy makers.

An often stated complaint at the conference was the lack of a micro-foundation of the underlying processes and the behavior of firms. And here is where entrepreneurship scholars from management schools might be able to contribute. As the early Schumpeter (1911/1934), I’m convinced that entrepreneurship is one of the processes which induce change in economic systems. We as entrepreneurship scholars have accumulated a body of knowledge about the determinants of individual entrepreneurial activity which might be useful for the micro foundation of evolutionary economics.

Interestingly, also entrepreneurship seems to move closer towards evolutionary economics. Intrapreneurship – one of the emerging streams within the field of entrepreneurship – investigates entrepreneurial behavior including the development and introduction of new products in existing firms. This is exactly what evolutionary economists have termed innovation. Entrepreneurship scholars interested in intrapreneurship are well advised to consult the relevant literature or even seek collaborations with evolutionary economists.

There are promising signs for the potential of interdisciplinary cooperation. At the Schumpeter conference roughly a quarter of the presented paper dealt with entrepreneurship. Furthermore high tier economic journal such as Journal of Evolutionary Economics and Research Policy increasingly publish entrepreneurship articles. As a starting point for interested entrepreneurship scholars, http://www.innoresource.org/ introduces the main ideas of and contributors to evolutionary economics. Uwe Cantner (http://www.microtheory.uni-jena.de/) and Ullrich Witt (www.econ.mpg.de/english/staff/evo/witt) are key players in evolutionary economics who have published entrepreneurship articles and are always open for discussing new ideas.

Witt, Ulrich (2008). Evolutionary economics. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, v. 3, pp. 67-68.

Schumpeter, J. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (transl. 1934, The Theory of Economic Development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle).

Michael Stuetzer

Academic aura of Oxford inspires discussion and interaction

ACE Director Per Davidsson was one of the invitees to the “2012 Summer Residence Week for Entrepreneurship Scholars” held in Oxford, UK, on July 8 –14.  Green Templeton College hosted the event, while the delegates had their accommodation at Harris Manchester College.  The residence week is a “different” type of academic gathering, where a group of some 25 accomplished scholars with backgrounds in business and economics work individually or in spontaneous/self-organised collaboration for most of the days, while the late afternoon hours are used for seminars organised “on the spot”.  Thus, the meeting can become pretty much what each participant makes it: a writing retreat, a networking arena, and a forum for dissemination and feedback. The very academic environment certainly helped fuel scholarly creativity, and in its own way, the four-seasons-in-a-day UK weather also helped making the event memorable.  A broad range of entrepreneurship topics were covered, from genetics to formal economic modelling.  Apart from more specific topics, much of the discussions centred on scholarly standards of publication and research and evaluation, and how to improve them.  Many new connections were made, and the delegates and organisers alike seemed very pleased with the experience.  Hence, the possibility of making the residence week an annual event will now be explored.